# Mistral 7B vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 34.4 to 7.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 22.9 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 346 | 182 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1318 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1302 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.97 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1036 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral 7B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.