# Mistral 7B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mistral-7b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 7.3.

## Snapshot

| | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 22.9 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 346 | 191 |
| Context | 8K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1082 | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 19.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 27.3% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 36% | — |
| MBPP+ | 42.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1067 | 1272 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 47.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 56.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.97 | — |
| HellaSwag | 81% | — |
| PIQA | 83% | — |
| WinoGrande | 75.3% | — |

## Math

- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1085 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.7% | — |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1294 |
| GPQA Diamond | 15.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 87.4% | — |
| MMLU | 62.5% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 79.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | 75.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1012 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1009 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1036 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 987 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1018 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1026 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 878 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1060 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Mistral 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1090 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1068 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1062 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Mistral 7B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Mistral 7B or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.