# Ministral 8B vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ministral-8b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where QwQ-32B leads 37.2 to 12.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.1% for Ministral 8B and 65.3% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.2 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 325 | 159 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | 1324 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Ministral 8B better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Ministral 8B or QwQ-32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.0 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and QwQ-32B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.