# Ministral 8B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ministral-8b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 17.7.
- Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.8 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 321 | 229 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.10 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |

## Math

- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | — |

## Multilingual

- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | — |

## Long Context

- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Ministral 8B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Is Ministral 8B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.