# Ministral 8B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ministral-8b-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 35.5 to 12.6.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 325 | 181 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | 1314 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |

## Math

- Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |

## Instruction Following

- Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Ministral 8B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Ministral 8B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.