# Ministral 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ministral-8b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 12.6.

## Snapshot

| | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.2 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 325 | 168 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1202 | 1347 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 11.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1322 |
| DTBench | 45.7% | — |

## Math

- Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1305 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1170 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1165 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1193 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1195 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1161 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1212 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Ministral 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1175 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1166 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Ministral 8B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Ministral 8B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.