# MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 19.4.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 204 | 232 |
| Context | 205K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena French | 1335 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1331 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.