# MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 32.0 to 18.6.
- MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 201 | 103 |
| Context | 205K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | 0.54 |
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1350 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1336 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1367 | — |
| LMArena French | 1336 | — |
| LMArena German | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1332 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1362 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 36.9 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Qwen3.5 Plus?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.
