# MiniMax-M2 vs Qwen3-1.7B

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-vs-qwen3-1-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.3 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 26.6 |
| Rank | 204 | 336 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena French | 1335 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1331 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
- Qwen3-1.7B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2 better than Qwen3-1.7B?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Qwen3-1.7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.