# MiniMax-M2 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 36.3 to 19.2.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 201 | 248 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1210 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1350 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1336 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1314 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1367 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | — |
| LMArena German | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1329 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1332 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1362 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax-M2 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.