# MiniMax-M2 vs Mistral Nemo

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.0 to 12.3.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
- MiniMax-M2 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 204 | 337 |
| Context | 205K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena French | 1335 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1331 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2 better than Mistral Nemo?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2 does, with 205K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.