# MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Step 3 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 34.9 to 24.9.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 188 | 145 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1367 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
- Step 3: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1366 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | 1333 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- MiniMax-M2.7: —
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1439 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1261 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1404 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1340 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Step 3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.