# MiniMax-M2.7 vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 5 categories and Solar Pro4 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 25.9.
- Both cost about the same: $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 196 | 121 |
| Context | 205K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1398 | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1437 |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1399 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.85 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1416 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1427 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1421 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.