# MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 Plus in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 24.9.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 188 | 103 |
| Context | 205K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | 621.92 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | 146.79 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1420 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | 10.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1439 | — |
| LMArena French | 1422 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Qwen3.5 Plus?

MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.