# MiniMax-M2.7 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 196 | 305 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1039 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1398 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1028 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.85 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1089 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 984 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1421 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.