# MiniMax-M2.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> MiniMax-M2.5 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 48.1 to 34.1.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 188 | 185 |
| Context | 205K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1387 | 1238 |
| LMArena Coding | 1381 | 1381 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | 16.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1350 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1366 |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1360 |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1393 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1362 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1171 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1358 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1355 |
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1359 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.