# MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 53.9 to 25.8.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 188 | 295 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1381 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1387 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1018 |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1393 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1358 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1362 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1171 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 978 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1359 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1007 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.