# MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-5-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 38.0.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 181 | 182 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1318 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1386 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1315 |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1378 | 1272 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1392 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1363 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1361 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1359 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1367 | 1296 |
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1359 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1289 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.