# MiniMax-M2.1 vs Wizardlm 13b

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-1-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 30.5.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 178 | 274 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1421 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1384 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 623.83 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 36.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 11.2% | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1397 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1378 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena German | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1397 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1392 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.