# MiniMax-M2.1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> MiniMax-M2.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m2-1-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 16.6.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 178 | 181 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1421 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1384 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 623.83 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 36.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | 1299 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 11.2% | — |

## Math

- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1397 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1289 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1378 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1430 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1381 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1397 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1392 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

MiniMax-M2.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.9 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.