# MiniMax M1 vs Step 3.7 Flash

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 37.5.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 150 | 207 |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | — |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1361 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Step 3.7 Flash?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.9 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.