# MiniMax M1 vs QwQ-32B

> MiniMax M1 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 4 categories and QwQ-32B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 41.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 69.4% for MiniMax M1 and 83.3% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 146 | 153 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1326 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1360 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1369 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1220 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1263 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1330 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than QwQ-32B?

MiniMax M1 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is MiniMax M1 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and QwQ-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.