# MiniMax M1 vs Qwen2.5-Max

> MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.3 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 150 | 146 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1360 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1358 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5-Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.3 vs 40.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.