# MiniMax M1 vs Qwen1.5-7B

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 150 | 273 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1107 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1065 |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1090 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen1.5-7B?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.