# MiniMax M1 vs Qwen1.5-14B

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 150 | 253 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1138 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1113 |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1102 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1113 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen1.5-14B?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Qwen1.5-14B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.