# MiniMax M1 vs Qwen-14B

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.3 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 146 | 273 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1072 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1360 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1369 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1220 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1029 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen-14B?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.