# MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where MiniMax M1 leads 45.8 to 41.2.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 150 | 183 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1302 |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1316 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1273 |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1296 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1290 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.