# MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where MiniMax M1 leads 45.8 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 150 | 191 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1272 |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1272 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.