# MiniMax M1 vs Mistral Nemo

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/minimax-m1-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 150 | 337 |
| Context | 1M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.55 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiniMax M1: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | — |
| LMArena French | 1370 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | — |

## Long Context

- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiniMax M1 better than Mistral Nemo?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.