# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 36.7 to 13.3.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 32.6 |
| Rank | 102 | 242 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1236 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1233 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1224 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.