# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 32.9 to 21.3.
- Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 102 | 105 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | 1243 |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Pro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1404 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1392 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.