# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen2-72B

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2-72B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 41.0.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 102 | 294 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1196 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1191 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1193 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen2-72B?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen2-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.