# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 39.5 to 16.2.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 103 | 297 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.