# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen Plus

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 39.5 to 23.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 103 | 210 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1324 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen Plus?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Plus?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.