# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 103 | 254 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1210 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1208 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1194 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.