# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Muse Glimmer

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 57.5.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 103 | 131 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1416 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1396 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1417 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1386 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1382 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Muse Glimmer?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Muse Glimmer share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.