# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Nemo

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 102 | 332 |
| Context | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Pro: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | — |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Mistral Nemo?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.