# MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 22.1 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Thematic Generalization: 45.9% for MiMo-V2-Pro and 20.3% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 103 | 266 |
| Context | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $2 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Mistral Medium 3.1?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.