# MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiniMax-M2

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-pro-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 53.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
- Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 103 | 204 |
| Context | 1.05M | 205K |
| Input $/M | $0.43 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | 14.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1352 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1331 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1361 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than MiniMax-M2?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.