# MiMo-V2-Omni vs QwQ-32B

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 50.9.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 91 | 153 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1326 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1323 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1278 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than QwQ-32B?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or QwQ-32B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and QwQ-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.