# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 39.9.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 91 | 54 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Omni: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1456 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1381 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.6 Plus?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.