# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 49.4.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 88 | 181 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1299 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.