# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Phi-4

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-phi-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 40.5.
- Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 88 | 279 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.07 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
- Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Omni: —
- Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
- Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
- Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
- Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
- Phi-4: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
- Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1212 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1224 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1234 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
- Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
- Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1217 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
- Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Phi-4?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Phi-4 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Phi-4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.