# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Phi-4 Mini

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 42.7 to 27.6.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 30.4 |
| Rank | 91 | 280 |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Phi-4 Mini?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.