# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 88 | 168 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1347 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1322 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1308 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.