# MiMo-V2-Omni vs Muse Glimmer

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 42.7 to 38.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 91 | 128 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1395 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1419 |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1388 |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
- Muse Glimmer: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1398 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Muse Glimmer?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.