# MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiniMax-M3

> MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-omni-vs-minimax-m3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 39.9.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 91 | 81 |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
- MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1470 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| SciCode | — | 47.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 640.02 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- MiMo-V2-Omni: —
- MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
- MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
- MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
- MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1462 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |

## Multimodal

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
- MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | 1254 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
- MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1318 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1431 |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
- MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
- MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
- MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | 1441 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than MiniMax-M3?

MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M3?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.