# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 14.2.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 138 | 251 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1220 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1233 |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.1 vs 36.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.