# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 40% for Step 3.7 Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 138 | 207 |
| Context | 262K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 694.12 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 2.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Step 3.7 Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Step 3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.