# MiMo-V2-Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

> MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#138); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/mimo-v2-flash-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.7 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.

## Snapshot

| | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 138 | — |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.14 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 432.57 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |

## Reasoning

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |

## Math

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |

## Knowledge

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |

## Instruction Following

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |

## Long Context

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |

## FAQ

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?

MiMo-V2-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#138); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.